Cost-effectiveness analysis of psychosocial intervention for early stage schizophrenia in China: a randomized, one-year study.

Related Articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis of psychosocial intervention for early stage schizophrenia in China: a randomized, one-year study.

BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 26;14(1):212

Authors: Zhang Z, Zhai J, Wei Q, Qi J, Guo X, Zhao J

Abstract
BackgroundA combination of psychosocial interventions and medications has been highly recommended as a successful treatment package for schizophrenia. Its cost-effectiveness has not been fully explored yet. The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antipsychotics combined with psychosocial treatment and treatment as usual for patients with early-stage schizophrenia.MethodPatients with schizophrenia (N¿=¿1, 268) were assigned to the combination of medication and psychosocial intervention or treatment as usual for up to 12 months. Cost analysis included direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs and indirect costs. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) ratings were assessed with Short- Form 6D.ResultsAverage monthly psychosocial intervention costs for combined treatment were higher than treatment as usual (p¿=¿0.005), but no significant differences were found in direct costs, indirect costs, and total costs between two groups (all p-values¿¿¿0.556). Combined treatment was associated with significant higher QALY ratings than treatment as usual (p¿=¿0.039). Compared with treatment as usual, combined treatment resulted in a gain of 0.031 QALY ratings at an additional cost of US$ 56.4, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$ 1819.4 per QALY gained.ConclusionsDespite some limitations, our results supported that medication combined with psychosocial treatment was more cost-effective than treatment as usual for patients with early-stage schizophrenia.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00654576.

PMID: 25064681 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]